https://www.geopsy.org/wiki/index.php?action=history&feed=atom&title=Talk%3AEffect_of_very_low_frequency_on_H%2FV 2026-04-22T17:46:28Z Revision history for this page on the wiki MediaWiki 1.34.1 https://www.geopsy.org/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:Effect_of_very_low_frequency_on_H/V&diff=2460&oldid=prev 2010-03-12T08:09:36Z

<p>New page: To be honest I find this discussion very artificial - and the example even more... what kind of low-frequency signal are you adding to broadband signal? A broadband signal should contain a...</p> <p><b>New page</b></p><div>To be honest I find this discussion very artificial - and the example even more...<br /> what kind of low-frequency signal are you adding to broadband signal? A broadband signal should<br /> contain already the low frequency component... shouldn&#039;t it? So it looks that you arbitrarily mix<br /> two signals which do not correspond to each other - one from a site recording and another one from<br /> &#039;&#039;whereever&#039;&#039;(?)<br /> <br /> If you use a broadband sensor in good installation and with reliable equipment (20+ Bit)<br /> there should be no reason why to exclude the low frequency content from your recordings.<br /> If we believe that we observe the response to the ground structure, this should be true also for the<br /> low frequency part of the signal.<br /> <br /> If your broadband sensor is not yet stabilized or there is reason to believe that you have<br /> a lot of tilting signals on the horizontal component, than this is another story....<br /> But then one should ask whether it is not better to use a sensor with higher cut-off frequency...<br /> <br /> [[User:Mao|Mao]] 09:09, 12 March 2010 (CET)</div>

Mao