No export to .max MSPAC

This forum is dedicated to discuss all problems and suggestions related to the use of geopsy database and its plugins (array processing, H/V,...).
Post Reply
jpvantassel
Posts: 3
Joined: Tue Sep 01, 2020 12:40 am

No export to .max MSPAC

Post by jpvantassel »

Hello,

I am interested in comparing dispersion data from the MSPAC and RTBF processing methods available in Geopsy. To make such a comparison I would like to be able to access the data of each time window from MSPAC processing through the production of a .max type file as is available from the RTBF. However, I see that this functionality is no longer supported in the newest versions of Geopsy, with the only option being to export in the .target format with the data already binned for inversion (screenshot attached). I have three specific questions:

1) Is there some other way of accessing this data that I am overlooking?
2) If unfortunately not, is such functionality planned for a future release? and
3) If unfortunately not, what was the last release of Geopsy that offered such functionality?

Some specs:
---------------
Version: v3.3.2-64bit, although I also checked v3.2.0-64bit
OS: Windows 10

Thank you in advance for whatever help you can offer on this issue, and for developing such a great software suite!

Joe
Attachments
snip_mspac.png
Snip of MSPAC processing menu, with .max option missing.
(18.28 KiB) Not downloaded yet
admin
Site Admin
Posts: 841
Joined: Mon Aug 13, 2007 11:48 am
Location: ISTerre
Contact:

Re: No export to .max MSPAC

Post by admin »

Hi Joe,

This is planned to be re-introduced in a future release (especially, if users are asking for it!).
You probably have to go back to 2.10 or so to be sure to have to feature working.

Best regards,

Marc
jpvantassel
Posts: 3
Joined: Tue Sep 01, 2020 12:40 am

Re: No export to .max MSPAC

Post by jpvantassel »

Hi Marc,

Thank you for a such quick response on this!

I will revert back to an older release. I know the group I work with under Brady Cox would be very excited to have this functionality back.

Thanks again and all the best,
Joe
Post Reply